Objective: During the presurgical evaluation, manual electrical source imaging (ESI) provides clinically useful information in one-third of the patients but it is time-consuming and requires…
Objective: During the presurgical evaluation, manual electrical source imaging (ESI) provides clinically useful information in one-third of the patients but it is time-consuming and requires specific expertise. This prospective study aims to assess the clinical added value of a fully automated ESI analysis in a cohort of patients with MRI-negative epilepsy and describe its diagnostic performance, by evaluating sublobar concordance with stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) results and surgical resection and outcome.
Methods: All consecutive patients referred to the Center for Refractory Epilepsy (CRE) of St-Luc University Hospital (Brussels, Belgium) for presurgical evaluation between 15/01/2019 and 31/12/2020 meeting the
inclusion criteria, were recruited to the study. Interictal ESI was realized on low-density long-term EEG monitoring (LD-ESI) and, whenever available, high-density EEG (HD-ESI), using a fully automated analysis (Epilog PreOp, Epilog NV, Ghent, Belgium). The multidisciplinary team (MDT) was asked to formulate hypotheses about the epileptogenic zone (EZ) location at sublobar level and make a decision on further management for each patient at two distinct moments: i) blinded to ESI and ii) after the presentation and clinical interpretation of ESI. Results leading to a change in clinical management were considered contributive. Patients were followed up to assess whether these changes lead to concordant results on stereo-EEG (SEEG) or successful epilepsy surgery.
Results: Data from all included 29 patients were analyzed. ESI led to a change in the management plan in 12/29 patients (41%). In 9/12 (75%), modifications were related to a change in the plan of the invasive
recording. In 8/9 patients, invasive recording was performed. In 6/8 (75%), the intracranial EEG recording confirmed the localization of the ESI at a sublobar level. So far, 5/12 patients, for whom the management
plan was changed after ESI, were operated on and have at least one-year postoperative follow-up. In all cases, the EZ identified by ESI was included in the resection zone. Among these patients, 4/5 (80%) are
seizure-free (ILAE 1) and one patient experienced a seizure reduction of more than 50% (ILAE 4).
Conclusions: In this single-center prospective study, we demonstrated the added value of automated ESI in the presurgical evaluation of MRI-negative cases, especially in helping to plan the implantation of depth electrodes for SEEG, provided that ESI results are integrated into the whole multimodal evaluation and clinically interpreted.
